During and after the rapid urbanization sustainability of the urban areas has faced many debates and criticism and so many policy agendas have been changed for it. Rapid urbanization is causing unsustainable resource management in urban areas, greater global mobility, enhanced construction, etc. that leads to unsustainable urbanization, and to maintain sustainability the proper urban planning is required (Simon, 2016). The environment is an important aspect of town planning and in the current scenario, the environment is in critical condition. The environment must be molded with urban facilities so that people can do their daily activities properly with the least strain and maintain proper health accommodating proper land use, providing green spaces, maintaining pollution, dividing the area into zones, etc. that was mentioned in the book “Town Planning” by Rangwala (2013).
To maintain sustainable urbanization, urban life, increase the health of the society, the ‘3-30-300 rule’ in urban planning is essential. The ‘3-30-300 rule’ [Figure 1 below] is a proposed rule in urban planning that stipulates that everyone should be able to see at least three trees from home; there should be a 30% canopy cover in each neighbourhood; and 300 meters should be the maximum distance to the nearest park (Bosch, 2021). These green and open spaces will help in adaptation and mitigation in the urban areas and will enhance the chance of the EU Green Deal goal and make the city transition towards a sustainable urban future.
Figure 1: The 3-30-300 rule’s Illustration (Author, 2021)
The aim of this study is to –
The following steps or methodology [Figure 2 below] have been undertaken or considered for this study to be done.
Firstly, the concept of the ‘3-30-300 rule’ in urban planning has been read and understood, and based on the understanding the aim and objectives have been set up.
Secondly, besides setting up the aim and objectives the scopes of the study over the past and coming decades have been described along with a detailed description of the limitations of the study.
Next, a literature study (described in detail in section LITERATURE STUDY) via, research papers, articles, journals, and different policies has been carried out to understand the projects undertaken or any rules and regulations that may be violated in the study area, etc. Along with it the parameters of the study have been understood and described.
Figure 2: Methodology of The Study (Author, 2021)
After these two steps, the study area has been selected and the preliminary study of the study area has been done where a detailed study of the study area has been carried out (described in detail in section STUDY AREA) in terms of demographics and socio-economic conditions, the major areas and lastly, the existing problems of the study area have been noted down.
As a part of the framework of analysis, after gathering the relevant data Land Use Land Cover (LULC) classification, green coverage analysis, environmental condition assessment, crime rate assessment of the study area have been done.
There is plenty of scopes to study the Concept of 3-30-300 Rules in Urban Areas.
The limitations of this Concept of 3-30-300 Rules in Urban Areas study are –
Plenty of the literature study has been done where different research papers, journals, policies have been studied thoroughly.
Firstly, the concept of the garden city has been read from which the green coverage of garden city and how a garden city works has been understood (Belij, ÄerÄan, FilipoviÄ, & GatariÄ, 2019). Here how a garden city as per Howard plays an important role in urban life has been studied and how the garden city can be incorporated into the urbanized development can be understood.
Also, how a garden city holds the threshold of urban development and makes the city more sustainable has been studied. The intellectual and activist approach of urban development can be a path toward making more sustainable development (ÄoroviÄ, 2014).
As per David Simon (2016) in Green Cities, there is a great correlation between the urban green and human activities that was described by McEvoy, Mitchell, and Trundle (2020) where they told that the green infrastructure of a city can be used as green space that will be physically active [Figure 3 below]. Green infrastructure will be indifferent type including street landscaping, green corridors, green roof, etc, that will help in commuting, and make people do active transport choices that will reduce the pollution.
Figure 3: Schematic Representation of Relationships Between Urban Greening and Human Physical Activity Levels (McEvoy, Mitchell, & Trundle, 2020)
Maslow’s Hierarchy needs (Donovan, 2010) have been studied to understand the requirement [Figure 4 below] that will help to reduce the crime rate.
Figure 4: Maslow’s Hierarchy Need in Urban Planning (Author, 2021)
Figure 5: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) Illustration (Author, 2021)
Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) (Cozens, Hillier, & Saville, 2005) that promote mixed land use development along with proper environmental health to reduce crime [Figure 5 above].
Along with all these few policies, the URDPFI guideline (2014) has also been studied for better understanding and providing appropriate proposals after the analysis of relevant data.
Few parameters have been selected from the literature study to carry out the study including population and the urban density of the study area, land use pattern, LULC, green coverage of the study area, green and open spaces category and quality, and environmental condition.
The study area chosen for this research is the hometown of the Author i.e., Naihati, located in the North 24 Pargana district, West Bengal. The geographic location of Naihati is 22° 54' 10" N latitude, 88° 25' 1" E longitude ("Naihati Map — Satellite Images of Naihati", 2021) [Figure 6 below] with an area of 8.35 sq. km. and elevation of average 14m. from the Mean Seal Level (MSL). Naihati is a class I city as per The Urban Development Plans Formulation and Implementation (UDPFI) Guidelines Volume I (2014) is located at the bank of the River Ganga and the growth is organic.
Figure 6: Geographic Location of Naihati (Author, 2021)
The population of Naihati grew rapidly from 1,65,091 in 1991, to 2,15,632 in 2001 and from that 2,18,474 in 2011 [Figure 7 below], with a population density of 261.54 Persons Per Hectares (PPH). The sex ratio of Naihati in 2011 was 984 females per 1000 males. Naihati had a workforce participation rate of 32.70% and the literacy rate was 79.56% including males and females with literacy rates of 82.85% and 76.21% respectively (The Census of India, 1991, 2001, 2011).
Figure 7: Population Growth (Projected) (Author, 2021)
Numerous data have been collected for this study. Demographic data and socio-economic data have been collected from the Census of India (1991, 2001, 2011). Land use analysis has been carried out by doing the survey to the study area and using the data from the Comprehensive Mobility Plan (CMP) of KMDA (Comprehensive Mobility Plan 2001-2005 (Kolkata Metropolitan Area), 2001). For making LULC changes for the study area, Landsat8 data (Level 1 Collection 1) from USGS Earth Explorer has been collected for 2 years (Earth Explorer, 2014, 2020). For the green cover analysis, the same data has been used but only band4 and band5 have been used (Earth Explorer, 2014, 2020).
Green and open spaces category and quality and the demand-gap have been done by a survey done last year (Author, 2020). Environment condition data has been collected from the World Weather Online (2021) and India Metrological Department (2021).
During analysis of the demographics of the study area then the parabolic population growth from 1991 to 2011 can be observed and while forecasting the data for 2021 and 2031, exponential growth can be observed [Figure 7 above]. This represents the future urbanization that may lead to more deforestation in the study area.
In the city the residential land use is predominant. Almost 59-60% of the city is residential that will increase in the future due to population growth. Commercial and mixed-use are 9% and 11% [Figure 8 below] respectively and to manage the population growth more mixed-use development is required (Bibri, Kärrholm, & Krogstie, 2020).
Figure 8: Land Use (Author, 2021)